£400,000 financial remedy costs bill 'woefully excessive'

A judge has criticised the ‘woefully excessive’ expenditure on costs by a woman contesting a post-nuptial agreement entered into with her ex-husband.

In Traharne v Limb, Sir Jonathan Cohen ruled that Amanda Traharne should either dip into her income or raise a mortgage to pay a share of her costs of applying for the financial remedy order.

Read the full article here: Law Gazette

You may also be interested in:

Webinar: Aspects of businesses: valuation, remuneration and tax

The Digital Edition (Issue 1) of the Financial Remedies Journal is now available to download