Skip to main content
What our clients say...

I have been using Quantum for 15 plus years now, and I wouldn’t want to be without it! The latest revamped cloud based version is more user-friendly, and is altogether brighter and easy to use. Having all of the forms in one place, and being able to easily draft multiple applications, forms and orders, after the initial case details are inputted and saved, is a real time saver. Clients particularly like the fact the Form E has in-built auto calculator. The customer service that I have experienced over the years has always been excellent and I would not hesitate to recommend Quantum Cloud.

Nicola Chamberlain , Head of Family, Blackfords LLP

Working on Cloud Quantum is a good experience. I like the ease of downloading forms. I also like the improvements that have been made making Quantum much easier such as entering current and future income needs. Being able to share the forms easily with clients and Counsel is also a much appreciated feature. It also has a refreshing look about it all and so much easier to use.

Emma Patel, Partner, Rosewood Solicitors

It is a lot easier to use and understand. The layout is much more modern and it responds a lot quicker than our current system.

Deanna Goldsby, Paralegal, Shakespeare Martineau​

Latest News

'In OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52 the time came, relatively late in the proceedings, when the husband had made a sufficiently clear disclosure to trigger the wife’s obligation to openly negotiate reasonably. She did not do so. She continued to seek a disproportionately unequal division of the matrimonial property in reliance on the husband’s deficient disclosure.'

23 September 2021 | Read more

Henry Pritchard, Pupil Barrister, 1 Hare Court


In this case Peel J (‘the judge’) dealt with an application by the wife (‘W’) for interim financial provision, including costs funding. This matter had previously been the subject of a reported decision by the judge who, on that occasion, determined that W had actually been validly divorced in China, meaning that her application under the MCA 1973 must be dismissed and that the only remedy available to her in England was under s.13 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (‘Part III’).

23 September 2021 | Read more

Sign up to our newsletter for weekly family law updates, resources and case notes: https://classlegal.com/newslet...

View Bag (0)