Skip to main content

A middle-aged solicitor’s latest bid for continued financial support from his parents has been rejected, with the Court of Appeal today ruling his proposed appeal is ‘completely without merit’.

Faiz Siddiqui, then 41, applied to the Family Court last year for financial relief against his parents pursuant to section 27 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989. He argued that he was a vulnerable adult who, without the court’s protective help, was immediately at risk of harm after his wealthy parents had ‘nurtured his dependency’ on them for the past 20 years.

Read the full article here: Law Gazette

You may also be interested in:

Develop your family law practice with a free 3-month trial of Quantum Cloud

Twenty-Eight Absolutely Identical Petitions: The Marriage of Gia Celine-Shelby and Alfie David Yorston and Twenty-Seven Other Related Cases [2021] EWFC 80

Sign up to our newsletter for weekly family law updates, resources and case notes:

View Bag (0)