Skip to main content
Judgment: A judgment in financial remedy proceedings. The marriage had lasted six and a half years. The wife had sought the full range of financial relief in her application, but, the husband being bankrupt, the case she in fact ran was to seek a dismissal of all claims by both parties, and rely upon a prenuptial agreement which provided for a separation of property. The husband sought a lump sum of £739,000, sufficient to discharge his bankruptcy, provide for his living expenses and purchase a three-bedroomed house. In HHJ Booth's judgment, there was no value in the prenuptial agreement. There was no formal disclosure, and no legal advice given to either party. This was a needs case. Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, as amended, required him to have regard to all the circumstances of the case. He ordered a transfer of 60% of the wife's pension, and payment of a lump sum of £270,000 to discharge the husband's bankruptcy and pay his legal fees. A fund of money would be provided for the husband to buy a house in his name, subject to a trust in favour of the wife, allowing her to recover the capital advance at such time as the husband no longer needed that home.

Sign up to our newsletter for weekly updates, resources and special offers:

View Bag (0)